you’ve got red on you
I bought Left 4 Dead and Left 4 Dead 2 in the Steam sale a week or so ago. I paid £5 for both. They are a few years old now but they were a big deal when they came out.
I have been playing through L4D. It’s zombies! Kind of (actually it’s some form of hideous virus, rather than necromancy). The first thing you notice is that you have been cheated. The zombies can run. This is not right. Zombies should not run. The second thing you notice is that the Source engine is starting to look really old. The character models still look pretty good (especially facially) and the animation is very smooth and the ragdoll system is still very nice, but the cars on the streets look like they’re made of cardboard. The third thing you notice is that the game throws you into it right away. I had been vomited on by a boomer within about 30 seconds and I had no idea what was going on when the screen went yellow, the music suddenly intensified and zombies swarmed me.
I’m kind of a big but unwilling fan of these terrifying first person shooters. I mean, I hate them, but if a game can actually make me panic then that’s pretty good, right? Most games are so laughably bad at creating any kind of consistent believable world or atmosphere that they are incapable of immersing you to the point that you actually jump when something surprising happens. Half Life (1 and 2) are severely underrated in terms of how scary they can be, even though (apart from the headcrabs and related monsters), they don’t focus on horror elements, it’s more just that they suck you in and know how to build an atmosphere. L4D is pretty good at it too, althoguh obviously it is supposed to be a horror game. I admit I am a bit of a slut for any game made by Valve, even if I do get to them several years late.
I guess the most interesting thing about it, and what pretty much defines game play, is the fact that the enemies are placed procedurally. The AI in control of it is called ‘The Director’ and it rewards you and punishes you for your play style, and tries to keep it challenging. It spawns the average zombies all over the place. Most of the time they are benign until you shoot them or walk too close to them, and they are pretty weak; only dangerous if there are a lot of them. The director can also spawn special events and enemies: boss types of varying difficulty and crazed hordes of normal zombies.
The point of procedural content generation like this is to avoid linear and rigid worlds and to make everything a bit different each time (and also to reduce development time). It’s mostly to make something interesting happen without the developer explicitly having to define/script it. A few years ago, Soldier of Fortune 2 had a mission generator which tried to generate unique missions to increase replay value. It did everything, including terrain, buildings, and enemy placement. The resulting missions were all different, and yet, they were all the same. A similar problem plagues L4D. The enemies are placed haphazardly and they have an annoying habit of spawning in areas behind you that you’ve just cleared, or coming from other nonsensical locations. Most of the areas end up playing out much the same because the director isn’t very imaginative and just places a smattering of zombies at random. He is an algorithm and it can show.
That’s not to say it’s all bad. The fact that they can spawn behind you does encourage you to keep moving pretty fast (sometimes too fast), and to keep checking behind you, you can feel stalked at times. But there are parts where the enemy placement is genuinely clever. One of the most fearsome enemies is the witch, who is passive unless you disturb her in which case she is VERY AGGRESSIVE and very fast and very powerful. Disturbing her involves getting too close to her, making too much noise, shining a light in her face, or more likely, accidentally shooting her with your auto-shotgun when you were aiming at a zombie who was inconveniently standing about 30 feet from her but directly between you and her.
As such, the best way is to be very careful and sneak FAR around her. But sometimes the game has placed her directly in a corridor you need to pass. If you can hit her from a long range and your squad has a hunting rifle and at least two assault rifles then you’ll probably do okay, if you can only get about 10 feet away before you break line of sight then you better hope you’ve still got a few first aid kits. Other times the game will use her at a pathway fork to cow you down a particular route. I encountered her today at a fork and I was pretty pleased with myself for sneaking around her, except I soon found out the game had used her to force me into a pitch black tunnel seething with zombies (and special zombies) and by the end of it we probably took more damage and used more ammo than had we just popped a pipe bomb under her and opened fire.
L4D is from the Half Life school of story telling which means it’s all done in-game and there are no lame cutscenes (good!), but unfortunately there’s not much *actual* story telling either, not nearly enough in my opinion. But the voice acting is nice and each character seems to have a personality, so it could be worse. I especially like Francis (the biker) who upon meeting a new situation remarks that he hates it. I hate hospitals. I hate tunnels. I hate airplanes. He is hilarious.
I guess…. 7 out of 10?
In related news, I’ve started unlocking quite a lot of cool stuff in TF2 and it’s getting even more fun. I have a sword for my demoman and a flare gun for my pyro. The latter is brilliant, I just run around setting everyone on fire from miles away. I rarely get any kills from it but it seems genuinely useful way to hamper an attack, most people retreat as soon as you set them on fire. I also have a new flamer that gives me criticals when I ignite people from behind. SUPER FUN TIMES.
TEAM FORTRESS 2
AS SHE IS PLAYED
YES. Valve released TF2 for free last week and I got around to trying it out on Monday. It’s pretty cool. The 6GB download took all day but it was worth it.
I used to play Team Fortress Classic YEARS ago. I played it a lot. I remember some screenshots of a development version of TF2 from around that time, it was done in the HL1 engine and looked nothing like it does now, and I was really excited by it, because, at the time, online gaming via the ancient 56K modem was a kind of magical alternate reality full of two dimensional explosions and people making crude remarks about your mother. But then I stopped playing it because of, you know, Counter-Strike. So I’ll admit I was never amazingly enthusiastic about TF2 by the time it eventually showed up because it seemed like something I’d already done and got over.
I WAS WRONG. I could go on about it for hours and explain the minute sections of the game, but I’ll cut all that out and just say it’s fun. Very fun. Hilarious fun. Light hearted, silly, and nonsensical fun. Unlike TF or TFC, which were supposedly serious war games (well, so they thought), it has camp pseudo-60s evil genius feel to it which is absolutely endearing. Even my sister is playing it and she has never played a multiplayer FPS before.
It’s also quite newbie friendly. There are a lot of classes but you don’t have to choose a very active one to begin with. The best beginner class is probably medic, you run around like crazy trying to heal people and don’t worry too much about attacking anyone. The strongest class is heavy, he is very powerful but very slow and draws a lot of fire, so if you find one, stick to him and keep him healed. Once your medic gun charges up (bottom right), you can make someone invincible by right clicking while your beam is on them (and keeping it on them). Again, unless there’s an emergency, you should wait for a heavy near the front line then ubercharge him and hope he rushes in and kills ALL THE THINGS. You get credit if someone kills when you’re healing them (kill assist) so it’s all good. If all else fails, ignore the needle gun whose needles are too slow moving to be useful most of the time, instead get out your melee weapon and go insane. I have found that most people don’t prepare for the case of a medic rushing at them with a bonesaw. Unfortunately, some do.
The downside is that Steam is annoying and there are soooooooo many updates for TF2. I trust that adding extra letters makes up for the missing “that” statement. I only downloaded it on Monday and I swear it’s had to download updates no fewer than four times since then. Also the item system is clearly a Skinner box; you get items which can alter your loadout for each class (different guns, melee weapons, hats…), and you can either buy the items, or get them randomly as you play. Obviously, the upshot of this is that people probably feel compelled to play past the point of fun in the hope of getting a new item soon. Games shouldn’t do this. It is evil.
The free version has some slight limitations in terms of what items you can get and how many you can hold (50 instead of 300, I think). To upgrade to the premium version it costs £4 (that’s because Steam won’t let you put any less into a ‘steam wallet’, and then you need to buy an item from the shop. The cheapest is currently £0.29. So you can spend the other £3.71 on some indie game or something). I upgraded my account because the game is worth £0.29 or £4, however you look at it.
Fallout!
Bethesda announce new Fallout game for 2010! I read it on Slashdot.
Maybe i am just too old for computer games (I am almost 22, when I see fresh faced 18 year old first years who barely look 16 wandering around uni it makes me think JEEEEBUS, I was a first year once… how did this happen?)…
…but, here is my reaction: “…”. I am sorry Bethesda, it was fun while it lasted but Fallout 3 was hardly brilliant. The combat system was… there is only one word for this, and that word is “shit”. It would have been better scrapping the FPS element and making it third person and having a proper turn based combat system with proper action points instead of your pointless Max Payne VATS system instead. Because aiming perfectly at someone’s chest with a big hunting rifle only to see the wall flash 2 feet away from them because your small arms skill is only at 62% gets old REALLY fast.
In fact you know what, just make it 2d. I am not being facetious. It’s completely unnecessary for it to be 3d, or pretty. And by making it 3d they need a lot more time to create locations and people and content in general. And this showed in F3 where supposedly you could walk across the entire ‘wasteland’ in about 20 minutes, whereas in F1/2 it’d switch to a map view and plot your progress while the ingame clock progressed rapidly.
ALSO it was not very Falloutish. I mean, the Fallout universe has spelling mistakes, dark/obscure humour and MASSIVE power armour. F3 had few if any spelling mistakes, was pretty devoid of humour and power armour made you look about 5’6. For example in F3 you’d never come across a man in the middle of the wasteland infront of a long rickety rope bridge over a canyon wearing a wizard’s robe, and see your character announce to the world in general “I think I should save in a different slot right now”, then proceed to be quizzed on the intricacies of the Fallout 1 engine rules. Things like that make the difference between memorable and brilliant, but unfortunately F3 is more just bland.
The enemies were crap too. You have encountered a giant radscorpion! Which is near impossible to kill! That sucks. In F2 I’d regularly encounter packs of 8 or 9 radscorpions and I’d think “woot XP” and get out my sledgehammer. In F3 I’d think “oh shit” and run backwards shooting it in the face with the biggest gun I have any ammo for and then I probably walk right into another one. That was crap.
And the locations were pretty lazy. F2 had great places like Vault City and New Reno which were very memorable. So was the one with all the scientologists (was it San Diego? *looks at map* no it was San Francisco) and the New California Republic. Broken Hills, the mining town with Marcus the Sheriff, everyone remembers him… especially when he joined your party, and you’re on a cattle drive, and he opens up with his minigun and in one burst not only does he decapitate all your attackers, but he also slaughters all the cattle you’re supposed to be protecting. It’s all memorable.
OTOH F3′s only interesting city was, er, what was it called, the one with the bomb? Barter Town? no that was Mad Max? I don’t fucking know. That’s how memorable it is. Anyway, that’s the first city you see and you think “great!” but then after it turns out it’s the most complicated ecosystem in the whole game you feel a bit cheated. Rivet City was big and boring. The Republic of Dave was pointless. Umm. Paradise Falls was empty. And so on.
Bethesda have also trademarked the name Fallout for TV and Film. Oh no. Please don’t. There are already three Fallout films, they’re called Mad Max 1-3. Unless the third one really was as bad as I remember it in which case we’ll cut it to the first two.
please note it was actually a fairly good game it’s just that since it was a Fallout sequel it should have been no less than perfect.
I liked the Dogmeat and Harold reference, and the Mr Handys’ transition to voiced 3d were superb.
I wrote more about that than I intended to.
